DotNetNuke Sucks
March 16th, 2006
Daily | 

Let’s face the truth folks, DotNetNuke sucks/sux.
I guess somebody out there thinks a Visual Basic Web Application is good enough to be used in a production environment, but I do not.
Open source Visual Basic code? That just does not sound right to me. It sounds like the last thing we need.








July 27th, 2006 at 11:34 am
You are right on it. The damn website for dotnetnuke.com is painfully slow, awkward and the “development” environment is bewildering.
So much of the .NET stuff in general is pretty lousy.
July 28th, 2006 at 6:56 am
Hi,
I work for a webhosting company and we install dotnetnuke for our clients. I absolutely despise the thing and decided to do a google search for “dotnetnuke sucks”. I came across the entry. But yeah, dotnetnuke totally blows. rock on.
-Matt
September 29th, 2006 at 12:51 pm
Only moron’s like DotNetNuke!!!
October 4th, 2006 at 2:46 pm
I landed here by googling “DotNetNuke Painfully Slow”. I agree it’s painfully slow and has many sucky aspects. But at the same time, I can’t dismiss it, although I’d love to find something better.
For professional projects DNN has other open-source projects beat hands down. I have tried several other platforms including few of the PHPNuke forks. So many of the OS projects just are too inconsistent, incomplete, confusing, and generally unprofessional to deliver to my clients.
As far as development environments, I’ve developed in JSP using opensource IDEs, hand-coded PHP, and created DNN modules in VS2003/2005. I’ve got to say that the M$ dev environment is much quicker, more productive, and more thought out.
So my conclusion is that DNN ain’t perfect, but it’s the best thing I’ve found so far. If there’s a better open-source (or low cost) portal system, I’d like to hear about it! But remember, the dev environment counts too!
-Robert
May 1st, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Robert… you look like a M$ seller… dotnetnuke sucks, and its NOT the best we have… Try OsCommerce and many other products, Google for CMS open source…
May 12th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Robert one word JOOMLA!
June 26th, 2008 at 6:50 am
DNN is a little to mature for Java developers, MySQL Bozo’s, and OpenSores morons. The problem with people like you is your lazy code. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to clean up behind opensores develpopers. Christ, leave the real world problems to us professionals.
June 26th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Technology often appears to suck to people that don’t understand it. As for the speed of DNN, I suggest you look into a concept called “precompiling”. Programs often run better when they are compiled. You see, humans code in languages and those languages can often be interpretted on the fly. That is OK for newbies but when newbies start compairing oranges to apples, they may being to think an interpretted system sucks when, in fact, it should be compiled for the platform. Poor newbies, they just don’t know any better.
DDN isn’t for morons. Moron’s don’t know how to deploy systems. DNN also isn’t for hacks that don’t understand fundamentals.
June 26th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
Oh, I should have mentioned. A sure sign of a newbie is describing technical issues in unquantified terms like “sucks, slow, bewildering”. They often follow that up with name-dropping other “preferred” products w/o a real benefit analysis. It’s all just too emotional for me.
Dead giveaway everytime.
August 6th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
I am working with DNN from its 3.x version. It is amazing the amount of errors I have encountered developing apps to DNN. I built a middle.sized project on top the DNN framework, and I painfully maintained along the time. In the meantime, I had to upgrade DNN, I think a dozen of times, changing from version to version, changing from Visual Studio 2003 , to 2005 now 2008, Changing from .Net 1.1 to 2.0, and every time, EVERY TIME new errors were emerging from DNN framework. I ending dealing how to solve the DNN errors instead how to build my app.
I think that DNN SUPER sucks. My biggest surprise was when I begun to program to Linux/Mono/PHP/MySql, etc. I tried a few programs… I just couldn’t believe that I installed those software and I had NO errors (every DNN installation is a pain in the ass).
Last thought: I think that DNN is a very over-sized architecture, too much variables to consider when you install, and a pain in the ass to extend and mantain.
And yeah if somebody needs some documentation about trouble, I have plenty of them and many ‘workarounds’.
This post is the result of the problem i had installing DNN 4.8.4 who has a nice bug. We’re talking August 2008 . How many version of DNN do you need to do the things right?
August 11th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
I have just installed DNN 4.8.4 All appeared to go well, apart from most of the module have been left out of this version. Anyway, as ever the page response time is terrible.
I am setting up this site, so i thought i’d look at the cache settings.. trying to drill down in to the site settings page was troublesome. As i attempted to open the little [+] sent to a setting dialog, the dialog opened and then immediately closed again, meaning i could not access the settings.
I know this is a minor GUI error, however i can not belive that every time i install the latest version, there are loads of new errors in the system …
I am not too pleased with DNN anymore, and i am searching for alternatives.